MothsLife

Women in Wildlife Conservation

· wildlife

Heppell: ‘Women deserve to feel safe’

Safety in wildlife conservation is a multifaceted issue that affects not just animals but also the people working behind the scenes. For women, safety concerns can be a major barrier to their participation and success in this field.

The prevalence of harassment and abuse in wildlife research is a disturbing reality. Women face overt aggression as well as more subtle behaviors like belittling or condescending language, which can damage mental health and well-being. Many cases go unreported or are minimized by those in power, exacerbating the problem.

Personal stories from women who have worked in wildlife conservation paint a stark picture of their challenges. Sarah Otto recounts being subjected to sexist remarks while working on a research project in Africa. A young ornithologist shared with me her experience of being asked intrusive personal questions by a senior colleague during a field expedition. These anecdotes are not isolated incidents but symptoms of a broader cultural problem that perpetuates sexism and harassment.

Systemic inequality has a profound impact on women’s experiences in wildlife research, creating a toxic environment where they feel marginalized or belittled. This affects their ability to contribute meaningfully and erodes trust between colleagues, undermining the integrity of scientific inquiry.

Creating a safer work environment requires more than just policy changes; it demands a fundamental shift in how we approach education, mentorship, and support systems within institutions. We must promote inclusive practices that encourage diversity and representation at all levels, from field research to leadership positions. Training programs can help identify and address microaggressions.

External factors also contribute to disrespect for women in science. Social media platforms have become breeding grounds for online abuse and harassment. By working with tech companies and social media platforms to develop more effective reporting mechanisms and accountability measures, we can begin to mitigate these effects.

As researchers and conservationists, it is our responsibility not just to conduct research but also to create a safe environment for everyone involved. We must amplify the voices of women who have faced harassment or abuse, listen attentively to their concerns, and use our privilege to push back against systemic inequalities. By doing so, we can build trust between colleagues, foster more effective collaboration, and advance wildlife conservation.

Heppell’s assertion that ‘women deserve to feel safe’ is a rallying cry for change in an industry that has historically prioritized scientific progress over human well-being. As we strive to create a safer environment for women in wildlife research, we must acknowledge the complexities of relationships and power dynamics within our institutions. By dismantling systemic barriers, we can begin to address the marginalization of women’s voices in science.

Ultimately, it is time to act with courage, empathy, and determination. By prioritizing the safety and well-being of all researchers – particularly those who have been historically excluded or marginalized – we can build a brighter future for wildlife conservation and for the individuals working tirelessly behind the scenes.

Reader Views

  • AC
    Alex C. · amateur naturalist

    It's refreshing to see Heppell highlight the pervasiveness of harassment and abuse in wildlife research, but we need to consider the intersectionality of these issues. Women from marginalized communities face double jeopardy - not only sexism, but also racism, ableism, or homophobia. To truly create a safe work environment, institutions must address these intersecting forms of oppression and provide targeted support for underrepresented groups.

  • DW
    Dr. Wren H. · ecologist

    While Heppell's emphasis on ensuring women feel safe in wildlife conservation is crucial, we must also acknowledge that many men are victims of harassment and abuse within this field. A one-size-fits-all approach to addressing these issues can be counterproductive, as it may lead to silencing or marginalizing male survivors who often lack a support system. To truly create a culture shift, we need to develop inclusive policies and education programs that account for the intersectionality of power dynamics, ensuring that both men and women feel empowered to speak out without fear of retribution.

  • TF
    The Field Desk · editorial

    While the article sheds light on the systemic issues hindering women's participation in wildlife conservation, it overlooks the crucial role of men as allies and perpetrators in these dynamics. The conversation surrounding harassment and abuse must also address the complicity of male colleagues who may not actively intervene or report incidents when they witness them. Without acknowledging this aspect, we risk creating a tokenistic approach to change, rather than a genuinely inclusive environment where women feel valued and empowered to contribute their expertise.

Related articles

More from MothsLife

View as Web Story →